or
http://www.youthink.com/quiz.cfm?action=go_detail&sub_action=take&obj_id=1442
"Mentoring is a brain to pick, an ear to listen, and a push in the right direction." - John Crosby
How were you scored and did your answers favor, need, equality or merit? Does this align with your personal beliefs? How? If not, why? If the virtual philosopher considers your score “inconsistent”, do you agree with his statement that you probably, “picked your answers based upon what sounded good at the time without much thought for consistency?” Why or why not? Were you surprised by how you were scored, why or why not?
Why do you evaluate ethical situations like those presented by the virtual philosopher in the way that you do?
The virtual philosopher examines the interplay of ethics and critical thinking. As discussed above, skills of a critical thinker include identifying, constructing and evaluating arguments and reflecting on the justification of one’s own beliefs and values. With this in mind, let’s take this a step further and examine another hypothetical situation:
You are a psychologist and a long-time patient reveals that they are a murderer and confesses their crimes to you. They continue by saying they won’t/haven’t killed again. The oath you took declares that a therapist should keep everything a client shares with you confidential unless he/she is an immediate threat to themselves or others. After spending many months treating this client, it is clear to you that they are not a threat. What would you do and why?
How has your experience as an IDS student enhanced your critical thinking skills? What about IDS studies encourages critical thinking? How do you think this will help you in your future endeavors like graduate school or your professional career?
Reply to at least one other student’s response. You can discuss their insights on the Virtual Philosopher activity, their response to the hypothetical situation, their ideas about critical thinking or any combination of the three.